R. RAMASAMY vs M. K. SRINIVASAN — MA 212/2026

Case under Civil Law : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Specific Relief Act, 1963 – Matters Arising Out of Suit for Specific Performance, Declaration, Injunction, Possession or Cancellation of Deeds/documents Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010059012026

Filing Date

29-Jan-2026

Registration No

MA 212/2026

Diary Number

5901/2026

Order Date

11-Mar-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Law : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Specific Relief Act, 1963 – matters arising out of suit for specific performance, declaration, injunction, possession or cancellation of deeds/documents Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.R. RAMASAMY

    Adv. RAM SANKAR & CO BY COURTS MOTION

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M. K. SRINIVASAN

    Adv. SUBHASISH MOHANTY[R-1] SUBHASISH MOHANTY[R-2] SENTHIL JAGADEESAN (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-3] SENTHIL JAGADEESAN (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-4] R. SHASE[R-3] R. SHASE[R-4]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Anjaria

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Anjaria

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 09-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 29-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MA 212/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Supreme Court disposed of Miscellaneous Application No. 212/2026 by directing the Registry to remit Rs. 1,00,000/- in cost amount deposited by the appellant to respondents 2-4 in equal proportion, following the death of respondent 1 on 10.02.2026. The Registry was instructed to complete the remittance within one week using the bank account details already supplied by respondents 2-4. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case