SATYA VIR SINGH vs THE STATE OF HARYANA HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA REGISTRAR — C.A. No. 5959/2007

Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010058102006

Filing Date

01-Mar-2006

Registration No

C.A. No. 5959/2007

Diary Number

5810/2006

Order Date

22-Feb-2018

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SATYA VIR SINGH

    Adv. ANITHA SHENOY (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HARYANA HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA REGISTRAR

    Adv. RAHUL GUPTA RAHUL GUPTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Feb-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 22-Feb-2018

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J. Chelameswar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul

  4. 21-Feb-2018

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J. Chelameswar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul

  5. 08-Feb-2018

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J. Chelameswar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul

  6. 27-Jul-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 21-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 07-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 12-Dec-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 18-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 10-Dec-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 07-Dec-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 21-Sep-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 20-Jul-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 08-Dec-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 29-Nov-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 16-Oct-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 08-Aug-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 27-Mar-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 01-Mar-2006

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 5959/2007

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 5959/2007 (Satya Vir Singh v. High Court of Punjab and Haryana) The Supreme Court dismissed the appellants' appeal challenging their reversion from judicial positions. The Court held that the High Court's law principle—that judicial selection must be from a panel of multiple candidates, not a single nominee—applied directly to the appellants' case, despite their not receiving a show-cause notice before reversion. Appellant No. 1 was subsequently promoted in 2006 and Appellant No. 2 in 2011. The Court rejected the appeal on February 22, 2018, noting a factual error in the lower order but finding no jurisdiction to intervene. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case