VISHNU DAYAL vs BALDEV PRASAD — SLP(C) No. 5214/2026

Case under Civil Law : Slps Arising Out of Interlocutory Applications in Civil Proceedings, Amendment of Pleadings, Time Limits for Pleadings, Interim Injunction, Addition/deletion of Parties, Etc. Section XI. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010057812026

Filing Date

29-Jan-2026

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 5214/2026

Diary Number

5781/2026

Order Date

27-Feb-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Law : SLPs arising out of interlocutory applications in civil proceedings, amendment of pleadings, time limits for pleadings, interim injunction, addition/deletion of parties, etc. Section XI

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VISHNU DAYAL

    Adv. ANUSHREE NARAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BALDEV PRASAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Feb-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 27-Feb-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prasanna B. Varale

  4. 16-Feb-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Mithal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.V.N. Bhatti

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Mithal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.V.N. Bhatti

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Mithal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.V.N. Bhatti

  9. 29-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 5214/2026

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Supreme Court disposed of the Special Leave Petition (SLP No. 5214/2026) filed by decree-holders Vishnu Dayal & Others against the High Court of Allahabad's order. The Court did not interfere with the High Court's cause-list regulation but requested the Allahabad High Court to take up S.C.C. Revision No. 45/2019 (pending since 2019) on a priority basis and dispose of it expeditiously, preferably within four months from receipt of this order, citing the dilapidated condition of the building and prejudice caused by the interim protection subsisting against the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case