MAHINDRA JAYANTILAL VORA . vs M/S. RENUKA BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS . — SLP(C) No. 5913/2007

Case under Section IX. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010057732007

Filing Date

23-Feb-2007

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 5913/2007

Diary Number

5773/2007

Order Date

17-Aug-2009

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IX

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHINDRA JAYANTILAL VORA .

    Adv. T. MAHIPAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S. RENUKA BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS .

    Adv. ASHA GOPALAN NAIR SUREKHA RAMAN K J JOHN AND CO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 13-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 12-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 10-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 06-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 04-May-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 26-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 24-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 13-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 25-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 11-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 23-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 21-Jul-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 15-May-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 11-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 20-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 07-Dec-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 25-Oct-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 20-Aug-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 30-Apr-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 23-Apr-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 23-Feb-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 5913/2007

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition filed by Mahindra Jayantilal Vora against Renuka Builders & Developers on 17/08/2009, finding it unsuitable for interference under Article 136 of the Constitution since the underlying execution application was still pending adjudication in the High Court of Bombay. The Court clarified that the dismissal expressed no opinion on the merits and directed that the execution application be considered independently without being influenced by any prior observations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case