BELIM KARIMMIYA MATUMIYA vs STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR HOME DEPARTMENT — Crl.A. No. 1107/2015
Case under 1511Ttf-criminal Law : Criminal Matters Other Than Covered by the Aforesaid Categories(cases Where Sentence of 2 Years to 5 Years Is Imposed.) Section II-E. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010057482013
Filing Date
19-Feb-2013
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 1107/2015
Diary Number
5748/2013
Order Date
01-Sep-2025
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Appeals Allowed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BELIM KARIMMIYA MATUMIYA
Adv. ARUNA GUPTA[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR HOME DEPARTMENT
Adv. PRERNA MEHTA[R-2] SWATI GHILDIYAL [R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Sep-2025
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Sep-2025
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Vinod Chandran and Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Anjaria
-
25-Apr-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Apr-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Mar-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Mar-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Mar-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Aug-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Aug-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Jul-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Jul-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-May-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Mar-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Mar-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-May-2014
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Apr-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Feb-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jul-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Jul-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Jul-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-May-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-May-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Mar-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Feb-2013
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1107/2015
Case Summary: Crl.A. No. 001107/2015 - Belim Karimmiya Matumiya v. State of Gujarat The Supreme Court partly allowed the appellant's appeal against a 2013 High Court judgment in a 1986 assault case. The appellant was convicted for attacking witness Hasmukh Chaganlal with a scythe, causing only an incised wound without fracture. The Court found that having already served four months imprisonment under Section 323 IPC and considering the appellant was not among those who pursued the main victim (who died before trial), the punishment was sufficient. The High Court's judgment was set aside, and the appellant's bail bond was discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts