G. VIDHARTHI vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI . — Crl.A. No. 708/2004

Case under Section II-D. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010056962004

Filing Date

12-Mar-2004

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 708/2004

Diary Number

5696/2004

Order Date

25-Feb-2013

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-D

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.G. VIDHARTHI

    Adv. RAJESH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .

    Adv. RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON ANIL KATIYAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 23-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 11-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 14-Mar-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 27-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 27-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 27-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 10-Dec-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 18-Sep-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 31-Aug-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 17-May-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 10-Apr-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 22-Feb-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 16-Oct-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 23-Jul-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 12-Jul-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 20-May-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 16-Apr-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 06-Apr-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 12-Mar-2004

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 708/2004

casestatus.in Summary

In Criminal Appeal No. 708 of 2004, the Supreme Court heard G. Vidharthi's appeal against the State of NCT of Delhi on February 25, 2013. The Court ordered that since Respondent No. 2 failed to collect an amount directed by the July 23, 2004 order, the said amount along with accrued interest be transmitted to the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee, with the Office directed to issue appropriate instructions accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case