MAN KAUR(DEAD)BY LRS. vs HARTAR SINGH SANGHA — C.A. No. 147 - 148/2001

Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010056062000

Filing Date

30-Mar-2000

Registration No

C.A. No. 147 - 148/2001

Diary Number

5606/2000

Order Date

05-Oct-2010

Document Type

Judgment - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAN KAUR(DEAD)BY LRS.

    Adv. P. I. JOSE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HARTAR SINGH SANGHA

    Adv. E. C. AGRAWALA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Oct-2010

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 05-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 02-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 29-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 18-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 06-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 17-Jul-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 24-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 12-Mar-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 05-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 16-Jan-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 04-Dec-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 14-Nov-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 09-Oct-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 24-Jul-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 21-Mar-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 22-Feb-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 03-Jan-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 30-Mar-2000

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 147 - 148/2001

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Man Kaur v. Hartar Singh Sangha Court: Supreme Court of India Citation: C.A. No. 147-148/2001 Date: October 5, 2010 Decision The Supreme Court allowed the appeals and dismissed the plaintiff's suit for specific performance, finding the plaintiff failed to prove he was "ready and willing" to perform his contractual obligations as required by Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. The earnest money was forfeited to the defendant. Key Facts - Agreement of sale dated October 20, 1978 for property in Chandigarh (Rs. 1,50,000/-) with December 20, 1978 completion deadline - Plaintiff (NRI in UK) represented by attorneys; defendant (Man Kaur) also represented by her husband - Performance date extended to June 7, 1979 - Plaintiff failed to appear in court or give evidence; relied entirely on property dealer's testimony - On June 7, 1979, defendant's attorney came ready to execute deed but plaintiff admitted lacking full funds Core Issue Whether plaintiff satisfied the mandatory statutory requirement of proving continuous "readiness and willingness" to perform contract obligations for specific performance relief. Court's Reasoning The Court emphasized that Section 16(c) mandates plaintiffs must personally establish readiness and willingness through credible evidence. Since the plaintiff never testified and his attorney (appointed later) had no personal knowledge of pre-1980 events, no valid evidence proved plaintiff's financial capacity or intent to perform. The correspondence and defendant's testimony (unrebutted) showed plaintiff lacked funds on the critical date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case