ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT THRU REG.GEN. vs M.R. SIDDIQUI . — C.A. No. 2245/2005
Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010055712005
Filing Date
09-Mar-2005
Registration No
C.A. No. 2245/2005
Diary Number
5571/2005
Order Date
03-Apr-2014
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT THRU REG.GEN.
Adv. RAVI PRAKASH MEHROTRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.M.R. SIDDIQUI .
Adv. MANOJ SWARUP AND CO. ABHISTH KUMAR ADARSH UPADHYAY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Apr-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Apr-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Mar-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-May-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-May-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Mar-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Oct-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Mar-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Mar-2005
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 2245/2005
Summary of C.A. No. 002245/2005 The Supreme Court dismissed both appeals filed by the Allahabad High Court and M.R. Siddiqui (an Additional District Judge accused of misconduct). While the High Court had quashed the 2002 reversion order against Siddiqui, the Court upheld the denial of emoluments for the reversion period, finding the two misconduct charges were intertwined and that insufficient evidence supported the second charge's proof. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts