UMESH CHALLIYIL vs HARIDASAN PALAYIL . — C.A. No. 5006/2004

Case under Section XI-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010055172003

Filing Date

10-Mar-2003

Registration No

C.A. No. 5006/2004

Diary Number

5517/2003

Order Date

28-Feb-2013

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XI-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UMESH CHALLIYIL

    Adv. HIMINDER LAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HARIDASAN PALAYIL .

    Adv. ARVIND KUMAR G. PRAKASH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 11-Dec-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 19-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 01-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 02-Aug-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 23-Apr-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 09-Jan-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 31-Oct-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 05-Sep-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 28-Mar-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 10-Mar-2003

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 5006/2004

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of C.A. No. 005006/2004 (Umesh Challiyil v. Haridasan Palayil) On February 28, 2013, the Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeal as infructuous. The case involved whether a Legislative Assembly Member took the oath in the prescribed form. The High Court found the oath was not taken correctly but allowed the member to retake it. Since the member's elected term had already expired by the time of the Supreme Court hearing, the matter became infructuous. All pending applications were disposed of, though the Court left the underlying legal question open for future consideration in an appropriate case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case