UMESH CHALLIYIL vs HARIDASAN PALAYIL . — C.A. No. 5006/2004
Case under Section XI-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010055172003
Filing Date
10-Mar-2003
Registration No
C.A. No. 5006/2004
Diary Number
5517/2003
Order Date
28-Feb-2013
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UMESH CHALLIYIL
Adv. HIMINDER LAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.HARIDASAN PALAYIL .
Adv. ARVIND KUMAR G. PRAKASH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Dec-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Nov-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Nov-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Aug-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Apr-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Jan-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Oct-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Sep-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Mar-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Mar-2003
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 5006/2004
Summary of C.A. No. 005006/2004 (Umesh Challiyil v. Haridasan Palayil) On February 28, 2013, the Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeal as infructuous. The case involved whether a Legislative Assembly Member took the oath in the prescribed form. The High Court found the oath was not taken correctly but allowed the member to retake it. Since the member's elected term had already expired by the time of the Supreme Court hearing, the matter became infructuous. All pending applications were disposed of, though the Court left the underlying legal question open for future consideration in an appropriate case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts