DHARAMVIR . vs THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND STATE OF UTTARAKHAND SECRETARY — Crl.A. No. 1613 - 1614/2011
Case under 1511Li-criminal Law : Criminal Matters Other Than Covered by the Aforesaid Categories(cases Where Life Sentence Is Imposed) Section II-B. Status: DISPOSED.
CNR: SCIN010055142011
Filing Date
17-Feb-2011
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 1613 - 1614/2011
Diary Number
5514/2011
Order Date
28-Oct-2025
Document Type
Judgement - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Data as of 03-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DHARAMVIR .
Adv. DEVVRAT[P-1]
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND STATE OF UTTARAKHAND SECRETARY
Adv. AKSHAT KUMAR[R-1]
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI
Fixed Date by Court
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Fixed Date by Court
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-Oct-2025 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 13-Aug-2025 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 07-Aug-2025 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 06-Aug-2025 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 31-Jul-2025 | Fixed Date by Court |
Orders in this case
Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters
Lead case: Crl.A. No. 1624/2011
Summary of Om Pal & Ors. vs. State of Uttarakhand (2025 INSC 1262) The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of appellants Om Pal, Narendra, Ranvir, and Dharamvir for murder under Section 302/149 IPC, rejecting their claims of self-defense and free fight. The Court found credible eyewitness testimony (including injured witness Bangal Singh) established appellants deliberately used sharp weapons to kill Dile Ram and Braham Singh during a boundary dispute, demonstrating clear intention to cause death rather than mere culpable homicide. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts