MOHINDER SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA . — SLP(C) No. 14877/2006
Case under Section IV-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010054932006
Filing Date
27-Feb-2006
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 14877/2006
Diary Number
5493/2006
Order Date
19-Oct-2010
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MOHINDER SINGH
Adv. SHALU SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA .
Adv. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA SHARMILA UPADHYAY T. V. GEORGE D. MAHESH BABU
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Mar-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Dec-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Sep-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Aug-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Jul-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Apr-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Feb-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Dec-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Oct-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Aug-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Jul-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Apr-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Aug-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Jul-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Jul-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Jul-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-May-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Mar-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Feb-2006
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 14877/2006
Summary: The Supreme Court dismissed Mohinder Singh's special leave petitions challenging the High Court's dismissal of his writ petition seeking appointment as D.P.E. (Directorate of Public Education). Singh, who was serving in the Indian Army when he applied for the D.P.E. position in December 1999, was ineligible for ex-serviceman benefits because he had more than one year of remaining service; the 1982 Government of India policy permits ex-servicemen to apply only within twelve months before discharge. The Court upheld the High Court's finding that Singh was not entitled to the mandamus and found his recall application wholly meritless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts