M/S SATJAS GLOROCKS PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR SHRI K.S. KHURANA vs M/S BHARAT ALUMINIUM CO. LTD. THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR — C.A. No. 19430/2017

Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010054752012

Filing Date

14-Feb-2012

Registration No

C.A. No. 19430/2017

Diary Number

5475/2012

Order Date

19-Apr-2018

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 04-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S SATJAS GLOROCKS PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR SHRI K.S. KHURANA

    Adv. PRAVEEN SWARUP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S BHARAT ALUMINIUM CO. LTD. THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR

    Adv. DIVYA ROY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Apr-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 19-Apr-2018

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman

  4. 18-Apr-2018

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman

  5. 14-Nov-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 14-Nov-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 21-Sep-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 22-Apr-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 22-Apr-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 22-Apr-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 04-Mar-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 02-Jan-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 16-Sep-2013

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 16-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 06-May-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 08-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 02-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 02-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 05-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 14-Feb-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 19430/2017

casestatus.in Summary

The Supreme Court allowed Satjas Glorocks Private Limited's appeal against Bharat Aluminium Co. Ltd., setting aside the High Court's order. The Court found that the arbitrator had properly reasoned both the acceptance of the claim and rejection of the counter-claim, contrary to the High Court's view. Bharat Aluminium was directed to pay Rs. 42 lakhs as awarded, with 9% per annum interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case