K.M. GUPTA vs PRAHLAD SINGH TOMER . — C.A. No. 322 - 323/2009

Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010054572004

Filing Date

10-Mar-2004

Registration No

C.A. No. 322 - 323/2009

Diary Number

5457/2004

Order Date

31-Aug-2017

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.K.M. GUPTA

    Adv. S. K. VERMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRAHLAD SINGH TOMER .

    Adv. B. S. BANTHIA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) PRASHANT KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Aug-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 31-Aug-2017

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit

  4. 30-Aug-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Dec-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 05-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 12-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 05-Dec-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 07-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 16-Oct-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 01-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 28-Jul-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 06-May-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 03-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 05-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 03-Dec-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 13-Sep-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 26-Apr-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 07-Mar-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 26-Sep-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 07-May-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 30-Apr-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 10-Mar-2004

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 322 - 323/2009

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of C.A. No. 322-323/2009 - K.M. Gupta v. Prahlad Singh Tomar The Supreme Court heard the appeals on 31 August 2017 and found no grounds to interfere with the impugned order. The Court dismissed both appeals, with all pending applications also disposed of. No further next steps were directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case