M/S. IMPRESSION PRINTS vs COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI-1 — C.A. No. 3536/2000

Case under Section I-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010053242000

Filing Date

27-Mar-2000

Registration No

C.A. No. 3536/2000

Diary Number

5324/2000

Order Date

24-Aug-2005

Document Type

Judgment - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section I-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. IMPRESSION PRINTS

    Adv. C. N. SREE KUMAR (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI-1

    Adv. P. PARMESWARAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Aug-2005

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 24-Aug-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 10-Aug-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 05-May-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 04-May-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 29-Apr-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 18-Jan-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 14-Dec-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 16-Feb-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 27-Mar-2000

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 3536/2000

  12. 01-Jan-1970

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary M/s Impression Prints v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-1 (C.A. 3536/2000) The Supreme Court dismissed Impression Prints' appeal, holding they were not entitled to Notification 65/87-CE's nil excise duty exemption for "made-up textile articles" manufactured without power. Although color mixing using powered equipment was technically a separate stage in manufacturing cotton fabrics, the Court found the printing and coloring process was so integrally connected to the manufacture of the final product (printed bedsheets, bed covers, pillow cases) that power use at this stage rendered the entire manufacturing process one made "with the aid of power," disqualifying the exemption. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case