M/S. IMPRESSION PRINTS vs COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI-1 — C.A. No. 3536/2000
Case under Section I-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010053242000
Filing Date
27-Mar-2000
Registration No
C.A. No. 3536/2000
Diary Number
5324/2000
Order Date
24-Aug-2005
Document Type
Judgment - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S. IMPRESSION PRINTS
Adv. C. N. SREE KUMAR (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI-1
Adv. P. PARMESWARAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Aug-2005
Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Aug-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Aug-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-May-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-May-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Apr-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Jan-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Dec-2001
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Feb-2001
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Mar-2000
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 3536/2000
-
01-Jan-1970
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
Case Summary M/s Impression Prints v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-1 (C.A. 3536/2000) The Supreme Court dismissed Impression Prints' appeal, holding they were not entitled to Notification 65/87-CE's nil excise duty exemption for "made-up textile articles" manufactured without power. Although color mixing using powered equipment was technically a separate stage in manufacturing cotton fabrics, the Court found the printing and coloring process was so integrally connected to the manufacture of the final product (printed bedsheets, bed covers, pillow cases) that power use at this stage rendered the entire manufacturing process one made "with the aid of power," disqualifying the exemption. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts