P.K. MAMUKKOYA vs M. BALAN (DEAD) BY LRS. — C.A. No. 2978 - 2979/2004

Case under Section XI-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010051562001

Filing Date

19-Mar-2001

Registration No

C.A. No. 2978 - 2979/2004

Diary Number

5156/2001

Order Date

13-Mar-2012

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XI-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.K. MAMUKKOYA

    Adv. P. I. JOSE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M. BALAN (DEAD) BY LRS.

    Adv. A. RAGHUNATH G. PRAKASH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 13-Dec-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 16-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 08-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 17-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 05-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 15-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 24-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 18-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 31-Jul-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 30-Apr-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 30-Jan-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 05-Dec-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 31-Oct-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 01-Aug-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 07-Mar-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 18-Nov-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 27-Aug-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 19-Mar-2001

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 2978 - 2979/2004

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: P.K. Mamukkoya v. M. Balan (Dead) by LRS The Supreme Court dismissed P.K. Mamukkoya's appeals challenging the Kerala High Court's rejection of his petitions to be impleaded as a party and to clarify a police protection order. After investigating allegations that respondents interpolated dates in execution documents, the court found no evidence of misconduct. The Court directed Mamukkoya to hand over peaceful possession of the disputed suit premises to the decree holders within three months, warning of contempt proceedings if he failed to comply. The 37-year-old decree (from 1975) was finally enforced with parties bearing their respective costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case