STATE OF HARYANA . vs ZILE SINGH . — C.A. No. 5517/2009
Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010050542005
Filing Date
03-Mar-2005
Registration No
C.A. No. 5517/2009
Diary Number
5054/2005
Order Date
29-Oct-2013
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA .
Adv. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.ZILE SINGH .
Adv. DEBASIS MISRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Sep-2013
ROPView PDF
-
09-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jul-2013
ROPView PDF
-
17-Jan-2013
ROPView PDF
-
08-Oct-2012
ROPView PDF
-
20-Jun-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jun-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Jan-2010
ROPView PDF
-
07-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Jul-2009
ROPView PDF
-
24-Jul-2009
ROPView PDF
-
09-Jul-2009
ROPView PDF
-
13-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jan-2009
ROPView PDF
-
22-Aug-2008
ROPView PDF
-
09-May-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Apr-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Feb-2008
ROPView PDF
-
13-Dec-2007
ROPView PDF
-
04-Dec-2007
ROPView PDF
-
24-Sep-2007
ROPView PDF
-
19-Sep-2007
ROPView PDF
-
03-Aug-2007
ROPView PDF
-
01-Dec-2006
ROPView PDF
-
15-Sep-2006
ROPView PDF
-
28-Aug-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Jul-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jul-2006
ROPView PDF
-
17-Apr-2006
ROPView PDF
-
24-Feb-2006
ROPView PDF
-
10-Feb-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Jan-2006
ROPView PDF
-
08-Aug-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Jul-2005
ROPView PDF
-
21-Jul-2005
ROPView PDF
-
19-Jul-2005
ROPView PDF
-
04-Apr-2005
ROPView PDF
-
04-Apr-2005
ROPView PDF
-
07-Mar-2005
ROPView PDF
-
04-Mar-2005
ROPView PDF
-
03-Mar-2005
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 5517/2009
-
14-Feb-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
Case Summary: C.A. No. 005517/2009 State of Haryana v. Zile Singh - The Supreme Court held that work-charge service cannot be counted as regular service for benefits under the Haryana Civil Services (Assured Career Progression) Rules, 1998. Work-charge employees engaged between 1966-1984 sought ACP scale benefits, but the Court ruled that "regular satisfactory service" requires recruitment through prescribed procedures, distinguishing it from temporary work-charge appointments. The appeals were allowed and High Court orders granting relief were set aside. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts