S. SREERAMULU vs HIGH COURT OF A.P. THRO REGISTRAR — C.A. No. 3007/2001
Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010050211999
Filing Date
23-Mar-1999
Registration No
C.A. No. 3007/2001
Diary Number
5021/1999
Order Date
24-Oct-2005
Document Type
Judgment - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.S. SREERAMULU
Adv. G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.HIGH COURT OF A.P. THRO REGISTRAR
Adv. D. BHARATHI REDDY K. RAM KUMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Oct-2005
Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Aug-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Dec-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Mar-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Jul-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Mar-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Jan-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jan-2002
ROPView PDF
-
05-Dec-2001
ROPView PDF
-
20-Apr-2001
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Mar-1999
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 3007/2001
Case Summary: C.A. No. 003007/2001 The Supreme Court dismissed Civil Appeal No. 3007 of 2001 filed by S. Sreeramulu challenging the High Court of A.P.'s District Munsiff recruitment selection (1996). The Court upheld the High Court's dismissal on grounds of laches, finding the petition highly belated as it was filed in 1998, nearly two years after the 1996 notification, when selected candidates had already joined office. The Court rejected the appellant's argument that women reservation under Rule 22-A(2) was illegal, confirming the Rule's validity and noting the appellant had no chance of selection even if his contentions were accepted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts