RAMESHWAR PRASAD JAT . vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN . — C.A. No. 8656 - 8668/2011
Case under Service Laws : Appointment, Compassionate Appointment, Temporary Appointment, Recruitment,probation and Confirmation, Suspension, Reduction in Rank, Termination, Dismissal, Removal, Retirement, Disciplinary Proceedings Against Employees Section XV. Status: DISPOSED.
CNR: SCIN010050162011
Filing Date
12-Feb-2011
Registration No
C.A. No. 8656 - 8668/2011
Diary Number
5016/2011
Order Date
08-Jul-2024
Document Type
Judgement - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Data as of 03-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAMESHWAR PRASAD JAT .
Adv. DEBASIS MISRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) RAM LAL ROY[P-9] RAM LAL ROY[P-10] RAM LAL ROY[P-11] RAM LAL ROY[P-12] RAM LAL ROY[P-15]
Respondent(s)
STATE OF RAJASTHAN .
Adv. RUCHI KOHLI (Dead / Retired / Elevated) SUSHIL BALWADA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN
Fixed Date by Court
Fixed Date by Court
Fixed Date by Court
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-Jul-2024 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 29-Feb-2024 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 28-Feb-2024 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 22-Feb-2024 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 21-Feb-2024 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
Orders in this case
Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters
Lead case: C.A. No. 7906/2010
Summary of Case CA No. 008656-008668/2011 Decision: Supreme Court dismissed all 47 appeals challenging the Prabodhak recruitment process in Rajasthan, upholding both age relaxation and bonus marks for project-employed candidates. Key Holdings: Court found Rule 13(v) providing age relaxation to educational project workers constitutional and valid, as it was based on intelligible differentia with rational nexus to recruitment objectives. Similarly, bonus marks for project experience were upheld as justified by historical context—para teachers in Shiksha Karmi projects had successfully addressed rural education challenges, and their experience was directly relevant to Prabodhak duties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts