THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR CRIME BRANCH INCHARGE POLICE STATION vs SURAIN SINGH LANGEH — Crl.A. No. 1122/2011

Case under 1511Misc-criminal Law : Criminal Matters Other Than Covered by the Aforesaid Categories(slps Arising Out of Quashing Applications, Orders Framing Charge, Summoning Orders, Interim Orders in Criminal Matters, Withdrawal of Prosecution, Orders for Further Investigation/re-investigation Etc. Section II-C. Status: DISPOSED.

CNR: SCIN010049572007

DISPOSED

Filing Date

15-Feb-2007

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 1122/2011

Diary Number

4957/2007

Order Date

23-Jul-2025

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Data as of 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

1511MISC-Criminal Law : Criminal matters other than covered by the aforesaid categories(SLPs arising out of quashing applications, orders framing charge, summoning orders, interim orders in criminal matters, withdrawal of prosecution, orders for further investigation/re-investigation etc. Section II-C

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR CRIME BRANCH INCHARGE POLICE STATION

Adv. M. SHOEB ALAM (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [P-1] PASHUPATHI NATH RAZDAN[P-1]

Respondent(s)

SURAIN SINGH LANGEH

Adv. UGRA SHANKAR PRASAD (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-1]

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

23-Jul-2025

Ordinary

05-Jan-2023

Ordinary

25-Nov-2022

Fixed Date by Court

11-Nov-2022

Administrative Order

24-Sep-2019

Fixed Date by Court

Orders in this case

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Crl.A. No. 001122/2011 Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed the State of Jammu and Kashmir's appeal on July 23, 2025. The State had challenged the High Court's order affirming the Trial Court's decision to release an immovable property (a shop/office at K.C. Plaza, Jammu) seized during a 2001 fraud investigation. The Court found the appeal had no merit as settled law—established by the larger bench in Nevada Properties Private Limited v. State of Maharashtra—definitively holds that police officers cannot seize immovable property under Section 102 CrPC. Next Steps: All pending applications stand disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Supreme Court of India All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case