GAJANAND . vs GAPPU LAL MEENA . — C.A. No. 1160/2002

Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010048792001

Filing Date

14-Mar-2001

Registration No

C.A. No. 1160/2002

Diary Number

4879/2001

Order Date

15-Jan-2004

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GAJANAND .

    Adv. SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GAPPU LAL MEENA .

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jan-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 08-Oct-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 23-Sep-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 08-Feb-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 11-Jan-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 20-Apr-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 14-Mar-2001

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 1160/2002

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Gajanand v. Gappu Lal Meena (C.A. No. 001160/2002) Outcome: The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's judgment and restoring the Trial Court's dismissal of the suit. The Court found that plaintiff Nabbo was properly served with partition proceedings notice in 1968-1969 under the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, making the 1969 partition order binding despite the High Court's contrary finding. Key Issue: Whether service of partition proceedings on Nabbo was proper. Multiple documents (personal service summons from 1968-1969, notice board affixation, and proclamation) established substantial compliance with service rules. Next Steps: Parties directed to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case