BIJAN BIHARI BHATTACHARJEE (D) THR LRS. vs <font color='red'>MOINUL HAQQUE MAZARBHUIYA(DEAD)</font> — C.A. No. 5218/2010
Case under Section XIV-A. Status: DISPOSED.
CNR: SCIN010048752007
Filing Date
14-Feb-2007
Registration No
C.A. No. 5218/2010
Diary Number
4875/2007
Order Date
02-Nov-2017
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Data as of 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BIJAN BIHARI BHATTACHARJEE (D) THR LRS.
Adv. ALOK SHUKLA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) MANISH VASHISHTHA
Respondent(s)
MOINUL HAQQUE MAZARBHUIYA(DEAD)
Adv. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-10] SHUVODEEP ROY[R-9] RAJIV MEHTA[R-8] RAJIV MEHTA[R-7] RAJIV MEHTA[R-5] RAJIV MEHTA[R-4] RAJIV MEHTA[R-3] RAJIV MEHTA[R-2] DEBOJIT BORKAKATI[R-10]
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT
Ordinary
Ordinary
Ordinary
Ordinary
Ordinary
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-Nov-2017 | Ordinary |
| 31-Oct-2017 | Ordinary |
| 26-Oct-2017 | Ordinary |
| 24-Oct-2017 | Ordinary |
| 24-Aug-2017 | Ordinary |
Orders
Case Summary: C.A. No. 5218/2010 On 2nd November 2017, the Supreme Court disposed of the appeal filed by Bijan Bihari Bhattacharjee's legal representatives against Salima Bibi and others. The Court upheld that the suit was rightly held non-maintainable since respondents had an adequate statutory remedy under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to seek reference for adjudication of compensation apportionment disputes. The Court modified the impugned order, permitting respondents to pursue their statutory remedy under Section 30 if they remain entitled to do so. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts