MADAN LAL vs HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR . — C.A. No. 1393 - 1394/2002
Case under Section XI-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010048642000
Filing Date
15-Mar-2000
Registration No
C.A. No. 1393 - 1394/2002
Diary Number
4864/2000
Order Date
28-Mar-2014
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MADAN LAL
Adv. BINU TAMTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR .
Adv. DINESH KUMAR GARG RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON PURNIMA BHAT RR-EX-PARTE SUNIL FERNANDES (Dead / Retired / Elevated) TARA CHANDRA SHARMA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Mar-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Nov-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Nov-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Nov-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Jul-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Jul-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Apr-2009
ROPView PDF
-
01-Sep-2008
ROPView PDF
-
06-Jun-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Apr-2008
ROPView PDF
-
04-Dec-2006
ROPView PDF
-
01-Apr-2005
ROPView PDF
-
04-Mar-2005
ROPView PDF
-
09-Aug-2004
ROPView PDF
-
27-Apr-2004
ROPView PDF
-
17-Feb-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Jan-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Dec-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Aug-2002
ROPView PDF
-
22-Apr-2002
ROPView PDF
-
19-Feb-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Dec-2001
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Oct-2001
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Sep-2001
ROPView PDF
-
15-Mar-2000
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 1393 - 1394/2002
Case Summary: Madan Lal v. High Court of Jammu & Kashmir Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals on March 28, 2014. The Court found the appellants' challenge to the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir's 2000 judgment regarding the selection and appointment of District and Sessions Judges under the Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1983 was not justified on merit. The Court also held the appeals were impermissible as public interest litigation in a service matter, since the appellants had no grievance against any individual selected candidates. Ruling Details: The High Court's decisions upholding the 75-25% promotion-recruitment quota, the medical test procedure, the selection committee's broad-based approach, and seniority determination by cadre appointment date were all upheld as valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts