SADANANDAN vs THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CITY TRAFFIC POLICE INSPECTOR — Crl.A. No. 1072/2013

Case under Section II-D. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010047542013

Filing Date

11-Feb-2013

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 1072/2013

Diary Number

4754/2013

Order Date

13-Mar-2024

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Appeals Allowed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-D

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SADANANDAN

    Adv. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [P-1] A. KARTHIK[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CITY TRAFFIC POLICE INSPECTOR

    Adv. NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2024

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 13-Mar-2024

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol

  4. 21-Feb-2024

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 21-Feb-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Jul-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 05-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 29-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 08-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 02-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 15-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 01-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 11-Feb-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1072/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.A. No. 001072/2013 (Sadanandan v. Circle Inspector of Police) The Supreme Court partially allowed Sadanandan's appeal from his 1995 traffic accident conviction (Sections 279, 337, 338, 304A IPC) that killed one and injured two persons. While upholding the conviction, the Court reduced the sentence from one year imprisonment to time already served (4 months 10 days), subject to compensation payment within 8 weeks: Rs. 1,00,000 to the deceased's family and Rs. 25,000 each to injured persons, to be deposited in trial court and remitted via District Legal Services Authority. Failure to pay triggers automatic revival of original sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case