T. SIVASUBRAMANIAM . vs KASINATH PUJARI . — C.A. No. 5388 - 5389/1998
Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010047271998
Filing Date
19-Mar-1998
Registration No
C.A. No. 5388 - 5389/1998
Diary Number
4727/1998
Order Date
31-Aug-1999
Document Type
Judgment - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.T. SIVASUBRAMANIAM .
Adv. A. T. M. SAMPATH (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.KASINATH PUJARI .
Adv. V. BALACHANDRAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
31-Aug-1999
Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Mar-1998
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 5388 - 5389/1998
The Supreme Court dismissed the landlord's appeal, upholding the High Court's decision to quash the eviction order. The Court held that a mere desire to live separately from one's father does not constitute "bona fide need" required under Tamil Nadu's Rent Control Act; a landlord must affirmatively plead and establish genuine, objective need for the premises, not merely subjective preference. The Court also validated the High Court's revisional jurisdiction to interfere where lower courts' findings lack evidentiary support. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts