NILKAMAL LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS NILKAMAL PLASTICS LIMITED) vs STATE OF KERALA ETC. — C.A. No. 8078 - 8080/2010
Case under Section XI-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010047222010
Filing Date
11-Feb-2010
Registration No
C.A. No. 8078 - 8080/2010
Diary Number
4722/2010
Order Date
15-Mar-2023
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 02-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NILKAMAL LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS NILKAMAL PLASTICS LIMITED)
Adv. RAHUL GUPTA[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF KERALA ETC.
Adv. C. K. SASI[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Mar-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Mar-2023
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta
-
02-Mar-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Aug-2015
ROPView PDF
-
19-Aug-2015
Office ReportView PDF
-
19-Aug-2015
ROPView PDF
-
19-Aug-2013
ROPView PDF
-
25-Sep-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-May-2012
ROPView PDF
-
02-Dec-2011
ROPView PDF
-
13-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Feb-2010
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 8078 - 8080/2010
Summary of Nilkamal Limited v. State of Kerala (C.A. No. 8078-8080/2010) The Supreme Court allowed Nilkamal Limited's appeals against the Kerala High Court's judgment, setting aside the High Court's reversal of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal's order. The case involved whether the sale by Kaveri Pet and Polyforms (which manufactured furniture under the "Nilkamal" brand license) to Nilkamal Limited (a trading dealer) constituted the "first sale" under Section 5(2) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act. The Court ruled that even though both entities were authorized to use the same brand name, the sale by Kaveri (the manufacturer) to Nilkamal could not be ignored for tax purposes, applying the principle from Kail Limited v. State of Kerala that inter-se sales between brand holders intended to reduce tax liability should be subject to Section 5(2) taxation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts