SHAMI vs SUKH LAL MAURYA . — SLP(C) No. 9760/2008

Case under Section XI. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010047082008

Filing Date

16-Feb-2008

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 9760/2008

Diary Number

4708/2008

Order Date

11-Nov-2011

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XI

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHAMI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUKH LAL MAURYA .

    Adv. M. K. DUA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 28-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 21-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 02-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 02-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 07-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 29-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 09-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 28-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 20-Oct-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 02-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 23-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 12-May-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 09-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 27-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 25-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 17-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 19-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 02-Dec-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 23-Oct-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 31-Jul-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 04-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 16-Feb-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 9760/2008

casestatus.in Summary

On 11/11/2011, the Supreme Court heard the Special Leave Petition filed by Shami against Sukh Lal Maurya & others (challenging a High Court of Allahabad order from 27/07/2007). The Court, after considering the pleadings, material on record, and submissions by counsel for both parties, found no merit in the petition and dismissed it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case