MUNISWAMAPPA @ MONTAPPA (D) BY LRS. vs G.S. BASAVARAJAIAH . — C.A. No. 3443/2003
Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010045872001
Filing Date
12-Mar-2001
Registration No
C.A. No. 3443/2003
Diary Number
4587/2001
Order Date
16-Nov-2010
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MUNISWAMAPPA @ MONTAPPA (D) BY LRS.
Respondent(s)
-
1.G.S. BASAVARAJAIAH .
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Dec-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Apr-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Mar-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Feb-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Sep-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Sep-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Sep-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Jul-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Sep-2001
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Jul-2001
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Mar-2001
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 3443/2003
-
01-Jan-1970
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
Summary of C.A. No. 003443/2003 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal by Muniswamappa's legal representatives against the High Court's impugned order. The High Court had incorrectly used Section 152 CPC (correcting clerical/arithmetical errors) to amend a compromise decree by incorporating a memo dated 2.8.1999, which the parties had expressly excluded when recording their compromise on the basis of the compromise deed dated 5.6.1994. The Court held that Section 152 cannot be used to substantively modify or review a decree, and the High Court committed serious error in allowing the respondents to amend the finalized compromise decree. The appeal was allowed without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts