ANITHA vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — Crl.A. No. 1675 - 1676/2026

Case under 1511Rb-criminal Law : Criminal Matters Other Than Covered by the Aforesaid Categories(slps Arising Out of Regular Bail Applications, Suspension of Sentence.) Section II-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010045552026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 1675 - 1676/2026

Diary Number

4555/2026

Order Date

01-Apr-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Leave Granted & Allowed

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

1511RB-Criminal Law : Criminal matters other than covered by the aforesaid categories(SLPs arising out of Regular Bail applications, suspension of sentence.) Section II-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANITHA

    Adv. ADITYA SAMADDAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

    Adv. AADITYA ANIRUDDHA PANDE[R-1] MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-2]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Vinod Chandran

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manmohan

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 22-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1675 - 1676/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Crl.A. No. 001675-001676/2026 (Anitha v. State of Maharashtra) The Supreme Court allowed Anitha's appeal against the Bombay High Court's December 10, 2025 order rejecting her plea for sentence suspension. The Court suspended her three-year rigorous imprisonment sentence pending High Court consideration of her appeal and ordered her release on bail with terms to be determined by the Trial Court. Additionally, realization of the Rs. 1 crore fine imposed was suspended, contingent on depositing Rs. 10 lacs within one month. The Court noted Anitha had already served over five months in custody and found no likelihood of her appeal being decided soon. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case