COMMR.OF INCOME TAX,PATIALA INCOME TAX THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER vs HARYANA STATE COUNSELLING SOCIETY THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR — C.A. No. 9364/2011

Case under Direct Taxation : Income Tax Act, 1961, Wealth Tax Act, 1957, Gift Tax Act, 1958, Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940, Business Profit Tax Act, 1947 [Other Than Matters Covered by Categories 1602-1605] Section IV. Status: Pending.

Pending

CNR: SCIN010045232011

Filing Date

08-Feb-2011

Registration No

C.A. No. 9364/2011

Diary Number

4523/2011

Order Date

02-Feb-2023

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Last updated 03-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Direct Taxation : Income Tax Act, 1961, Wealth Tax Act, 1957, Gift Tax Act, 1958, Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940, Business Profit Tax Act, 1947 [other than matters covered by categories 1602-1605] Section IV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.COMMR.OF INCOME TAX,PATIALA INCOME TAX THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER

    Adv. B. V. BALARAM DAS (Dead / Retired / Elevated) RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HARYANA STATE COUNSELLING SOCIETY THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR

    Adv. SAMAR VIJAY SINGH[R-1]

Case History

  1. 02-Feb-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  2. 02-Feb-2023

    Administrative Order

    Registrar

  3. 17-Sep-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 17-Sep-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 17-Oct-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 20-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 04-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 28-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 08-Feb-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 9364/2011

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: On 02-02-2023, the Supreme Court Registrar heard Civil Appeal No. 9364/2011 between the Commissioner of Income Tax, Patiala (appellant) and Haryana State Counselling Society (respondent). Both parties were duly represented. The Court directed the Registry to verify and update records following the respondent's advocate-on-record filing a memo of appearance, and to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules, after noting that affidavit of valuation, ad valorem court fee, and appellant's statement of case have been filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case