MAHILA BAJRANGI(DEAD) THR.LRS. . vs BADRIBAI — C.A. No. 4594/1995

Case under Section XII-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010045201995

Filing Date

07-Apr-1995

Registration No

C.A. No. 4594/1995

Diary Number

4520/1995

Order Date

19-Dec-2002

Document Type

Judgment - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHILA BAJRANGI(DEAD) THR.LRS. .

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BADRIBAI

    Adv. SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Dec-2002

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 19-Dec-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 10-Dec-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 31-Oct-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 07-Apr-1995

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 4594/1995

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Mahila Bajrangi v. Badribai (2002) Decision: The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal, upholding the Division Bench's decision that plaintiff Bajrangi failed to establish her claim to a house property in Shyopur. The court found that Bajrangi could not prove that Gopali was the legal wife of deceased Gendilal or that Bajrangi was their biological daughter, and therefore rejected her title claim and the gift deed allegedly executed by Gopali. Key Reasoning: The court rejected evidence from mutation proceedings as insufficient to prove marriage and parentage, finding statements made after disputes arose to be self-serving and lacking independent corroboration. The court also held that mutation proceedings before revenue authorities are not judicial proceedings capable of establishing res judicata in civil suits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case