UNION OF INDIA vs KANWAL SINGH . — C.A. No. 5326/2014
Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010044702005
Filing Date
24-Feb-2005
Registration No
C.A. No. 5326/2014
Diary Number
4470/2005
Order Date
30-Apr-2014
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA
Adv. ANIL KATIYAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.KANWAL SINGH .
Adv. RANBIR SINGH YADAV SAHARYA & CO.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Apr-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Mar-2014
ROPView PDF
-
05-Dec-2013
ROPView PDF
-
27-Aug-2013
ROPView PDF
-
13-Feb-2013
ROPView PDF
-
15-Oct-2012
ROPView PDF
-
03-Sep-2012
ROPView PDF
-
20-Jul-2012
ROPView PDF
-
16-Jan-2012
ROPView PDF
-
21-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
11-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
19-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
19-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
19-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
04-Mar-2011
ROPView PDF
-
23-Feb-2011
ROPView PDF
-
08-Nov-2010
ROPView PDF
-
23-Jul-2010
ROPView PDF
-
13-Jul-2010
ROPView PDF
-
29-Mar-2010
ROPView PDF
-
29-Jul-2009
ROPView PDF
-
08-Aug-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-May-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Apr-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Apr-2007
ROPView PDF
-
26-Apr-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Feb-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Sep-2005
ROPView PDF
-
01-Aug-2005
ROPView PDF
-
18-Jul-2005
ROPView PDF
-
11-Apr-2005
ROPView PDF
-
28-Mar-2005
ROPView PDF
-
14-Mar-2005
ROPView PDF
-
11-Mar-2005
ROPView PDF
-
25-Feb-2005
ROPView PDF
-
24-Feb-2005
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 5326/2014
-
11-Feb-2005
ROPView PDF
-
17-Jan-2005
ROPView PDF
-
06-Jan-2005
ROPView PDF
Summary of C.A. No. 005326/2014 (Union of India v. Kanwal Singh) The Supreme Court dismissed the Union of India's appeal against the High Court's judgment that increased land compensation for acquired properties in Delhi villages Beharipur and Karawal Nagar from Rs. 5,280-5,640 per bigha (awarded by Reference Court) to Rs. 7,500-8,000 per bigha. Finding no error in the High Court's analysis, the Court affirmed the judgment with no costs awarded to either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts