M/S.VINAY SOLVENT EXTRACTION INDT. P.LTD vs COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, GUJARAT — C.A. No. 2523 - 2529/2000
Case under Section I-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010044662000
Filing Date
09-Mar-2000
Registration No
C.A. No. 2523 - 2529/2000
Diary Number
4466/2000
Order Date
20-Apr-2005
Document Type
Judgment - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S.VINAY SOLVENT EXTRACTION INDT. P.LTD
Adv. V. BALACHANDRAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, GUJARAT
Adv. P. PARMESWARAN
Case History
Case Summary: M/s Vinay Solvent Extraction Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Gujarat Decision: The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, holding that Vinay Solvent Extraction Industries (the appellants) were not entitled to excise duty exemption under Notification No. 262/86-C.E. The Court found that as the actual manufacturers under an authorization agreement, the appellants could only claim exemption if they produced certificates from the Deputy Director of Vanaspati, Vegetable Oils and Fats proving their oil was manufactured from solvent-extracted vegetable oils—which they failed to do, providing instead certificates naming Vijay Oil Mill. Key Reasoning: The appellants' own authorization declaration established them as manufacturers handling procedural formalities on job-work basis. They filed the classification list and claimed the exemption as manufacturers. The Court rejected their attempt to later argue Vijay Oil Mill was the real manufacturer, holding that a party cannot simultaneously claim exemption as manufacturer while disavowing manufacturing responsibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts