C. ANGULAKSHMI vs K.PAPPATHI — Crl.A. No. 1031/2014
Case under Section II-C. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010044452013
Filing Date
07-Feb-2013
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 1031/2014
Diary Number
4445/2013
Order Date
18-Jun-2019
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.C. ANGULAKSHMI
Respondent(s)
-
1.K.PAPPATHI
Adv. RAHUL KAUSHIK (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Jun-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Jun-2019
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant
-
24-Apr-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Apr-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Dec-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Dec-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Oct-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Oct-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Aug-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Aug-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Apr-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Apr-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Feb-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Apr-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Apr-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Jul-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Feb-2013
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1031/2014
Case Summary: Crl.A. No. 001031/2014 - C. Angulakshmi v. K. Pappathi C. Angulakshmi was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to six months imprisonment plus a fine of Rs. 2,00,000. She had deposited Rs. 1,00,000 before the High Court and was directed to deposit the remaining Rs. 1,00,000, though records do not confirm whether the balance was deposited. The Supreme Court dismissed the criminal appeal for non-prosecution on June 18, 2019, as the appellant failed to take steps for representation before the Court despite being served notice and a senior counsel being designated for her case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts