C. ANGULAKSHMI vs K.PAPPATHI — Crl.A. No. 1031/2014

Case under Section II-C. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010044452013

Filing Date

07-Feb-2013

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 1031/2014

Diary Number

4445/2013

Order Date

18-Jun-2019

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-C

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.C. ANGULAKSHMI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.K.PAPPATHI

    Adv. RAHUL KAUSHIK (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 18-Jun-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant

  4. 24-Apr-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 24-Apr-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 15-Dec-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 15-Dec-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 24-Oct-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 24-Oct-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 12-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 12-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 23-Apr-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 23-Apr-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 13-Feb-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 28-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 15-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 05-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 17-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 08-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 15-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 12-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 08-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 07-Feb-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1031/2014

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.A. No. 001031/2014 - C. Angulakshmi v. K. Pappathi C. Angulakshmi was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to six months imprisonment plus a fine of Rs. 2,00,000. She had deposited Rs. 1,00,000 before the High Court and was directed to deposit the remaining Rs. 1,00,000, though records do not confirm whether the balance was deposited. The Supreme Court dismissed the criminal appeal for non-prosecution on June 18, 2019, as the appellant failed to take steps for representation before the Court despite being served notice and a senior counsel being designated for her case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case