U.T. CHANDIGARH . vs THANGAVEL . — C.A. No. 6783/2009

Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010043592005

Filing Date

23-Feb-2005

Registration No

C.A. No. 6783/2009

Diary Number

4359/2005

Order Date

03-Apr-2014

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.U.T. CHANDIGARH .

    Adv. JATINDER KUMAR BHATIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THANGAVEL .

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 01-Apr-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 01-Apr-2014

    Office ReportView PDF

  5. 17-Dec-2013
  6. 30-Sep-2013

    Office ReportView PDF

  7. 30-Sep-2013
  8. 26-Aug-2013
  9. 29-Jul-2013
  10. 10-May-2013
  11. 09-Apr-2013
  12. 08-Mar-2013
  13. 03-Dec-2012
  14. 06-Jul-2012
  15. 28-Nov-2011
  16. 11-Oct-2011
  17. 17-Aug-2011
  18. 06-May-2011
  19. 29-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 03-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 30-Mar-2009
  22. 30-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 18-Feb-2009
  24. 18-Feb-2009
  25. 11-Feb-2009
  26. 05-Feb-2009
  27. 14-Jan-2009
  28. 12-Dec-2008
  29. 28-Nov-2008
  30. 16-Oct-2008
  31. 25-Sep-2008
  32. 03-Sep-2008
  33. 21-Aug-2008
  34. 30-Jul-2008
  35. 15-Jul-2008
  36. 10-Jul-2008
  37. 13-May-2008
  38. 12-May-2008
  39. 23-Apr-2008
  40. 22-Apr-2008
  41. 03-Apr-2008
  42. 28-Mar-2008
  43. 13-Mar-2008
  44. 25-Feb-2008
  45. 08-Feb-2008
  46. 07-Feb-2008
  47. 23-Jan-2008
  48. 28-Nov-2007
  49. 15-Nov-2007
  50. 22-Oct-2007
  51. 09-Oct-2007
  52. 05-Oct-2007
  53. 24-Sep-2007
  54. 23-Aug-2007
  55. 22-Aug-2007
  56. 18-May-2007
  57. 18-May-2007
  58. 18-May-2007
  59. 16-May-2007
  60. 01-May-2007
  61. 29-Mar-2007
  62. 20-Feb-2007
  63. 20-Feb-2007
  64. 20-Feb-2007
  65. 07-Feb-2007
  66. 19-Jan-2007
  67. 15-Jan-2007
  68. 29-Nov-2006
  69. 29-Nov-2006
  70. 09-Nov-2006
  71. 12-Oct-2006
  72. 12-Oct-2006
  73. 12-Oct-2006
  74. 11-Oct-2006
  75. 31-Aug-2006
  76. 31-Aug-2006
  77. 31-Aug-2006
  78. 31-Aug-2006
  79. 27-Jul-2006
  80. 27-Jul-2006
  81. 26-Jul-2006
  82. 26-Jul-2006
  83. 13-Jul-2006
  84. 13-Jul-2006
  85. 13-Jul-2006
  86. 13-Jul-2006
  87. 06-Jul-2006
  88. 02-Jan-2006
  89. 29-Aug-2005
  90. 25-Jul-2005
  91. 25-Jul-2005
  92. 25-Jul-2005
  93. 25-Jul-2005
  94. 25-Jul-2005
  95. 25-Jul-2005
  96. 25-Jul-2005
  97. 25-Jul-2005
  98. 09-May-2005
  99. 09-May-2005
  100. 09-May-2005
  101. 09-May-2005
  102. 09-May-2005
  103. 09-May-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  104. 09-May-2005
  105. 09-May-2005
  106. 09-May-2005
  107. 07-Mar-2005
  108. 28-Feb-2005
  109. 23-Feb-2005

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 6783/2009

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 6783/2009 U.T. Chandigarh v. Thangavel (decided 3 April 2014) The Supreme Court dismissed Chandigarh Administration's appeals challenging the regularization of work-charged/daily wage employees. The court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal and High Court decisions requiring regularization of respondents who had completed 25+ years of service. The court directed that if regular posts are unavailable, employees must continue in work-charged positions with full salary including dearness allowance and CPWD pensionary benefits; those already regularized receive regular employee benefits including gratuity and pension; widows receive family pension; and the administration must expedite remaining regularizations and pension payments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case