U.T. CHANDIGARH . vs THANGAVEL . — C.A. No. 6783/2009
Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010043592005
Filing Date
23-Feb-2005
Registration No
C.A. No. 6783/2009
Diary Number
4359/2005
Order Date
03-Apr-2014
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.U.T. CHANDIGARH .
Adv. JATINDER KUMAR BHATIA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THANGAVEL .
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Apr-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Apr-2014
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Apr-2014
Office ReportView PDF
-
17-Dec-2013
ROPView PDF
-
30-Sep-2013
Office ReportView PDF
-
30-Sep-2013
ROPView PDF
-
26-Aug-2013
ROPView PDF
-
29-Jul-2013
ROPView PDF
-
10-May-2013
ROPView PDF
-
09-Apr-2013
ROPView PDF
-
08-Mar-2013
ROPView PDF
-
03-Dec-2012
ROPView PDF
-
06-Jul-2012
ROPView PDF
-
28-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
11-Oct-2011
ROPView PDF
-
17-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
06-May-2011
ROPView PDF
-
29-Sep-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Mar-2009
ROPView PDF
-
30-Mar-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Feb-2009
ROPView PDF
-
18-Feb-2009
ROPView PDF
-
11-Feb-2009
ROPView PDF
-
05-Feb-2009
ROPView PDF
-
14-Jan-2009
ROPView PDF
-
12-Dec-2008
ROPView PDF
-
28-Nov-2008
ROPView PDF
-
16-Oct-2008
ROPView PDF
-
25-Sep-2008
ROPView PDF
-
03-Sep-2008
ROPView PDF
-
21-Aug-2008
ROPView PDF
-
30-Jul-2008
ROPView PDF
-
15-Jul-2008
ROPView PDF
-
10-Jul-2008
ROPView PDF
-
13-May-2008
ROPView PDF
-
12-May-2008
ROPView PDF
-
23-Apr-2008
ROPView PDF
-
22-Apr-2008
ROPView PDF
-
03-Apr-2008
ROPView PDF
-
28-Mar-2008
ROPView PDF
-
13-Mar-2008
ROPView PDF
-
25-Feb-2008
ROPView PDF
-
08-Feb-2008
ROPView PDF
-
07-Feb-2008
ROPView PDF
-
23-Jan-2008
ROPView PDF
-
28-Nov-2007
ROPView PDF
-
15-Nov-2007
ROPView PDF
-
22-Oct-2007
ROPView PDF
-
09-Oct-2007
ROPView PDF
-
05-Oct-2007
ROPView PDF
-
24-Sep-2007
ROPView PDF
-
23-Aug-2007
ROPView PDF
-
22-Aug-2007
ROPView PDF
-
18-May-2007
ROPView PDF
-
18-May-2007
ROPView PDF
-
18-May-2007
ROPView PDF
-
16-May-2007
ROPView PDF
-
01-May-2007
ROPView PDF
-
29-Mar-2007
ROPView PDF
-
20-Feb-2007
ROPView PDF
-
20-Feb-2007
ROPView PDF
-
20-Feb-2007
ROPView PDF
-
07-Feb-2007
ROPView PDF
-
19-Jan-2007
ROPView PDF
-
15-Jan-2007
ROPView PDF
-
29-Nov-2006
ROPView PDF
-
29-Nov-2006
ROPView PDF
-
09-Nov-2006
ROPView PDF
-
12-Oct-2006
ROPView PDF
-
12-Oct-2006
ROPView PDF
-
12-Oct-2006
ROPView PDF
-
11-Oct-2006
ROPView PDF
-
31-Aug-2006
ROPView PDF
-
31-Aug-2006
ROPView PDF
-
31-Aug-2006
ROPView PDF
-
31-Aug-2006
ROPView PDF
-
27-Jul-2006
ROPView PDF
-
27-Jul-2006
ROPView PDF
-
26-Jul-2006
ROPView PDF
-
26-Jul-2006
ROPView PDF
-
13-Jul-2006
ROPView PDF
-
13-Jul-2006
ROPView PDF
-
13-Jul-2006
ROPView PDF
-
13-Jul-2006
ROPView PDF
-
06-Jul-2006
ROPView PDF
-
02-Jan-2006
ROPView PDF
-
29-Aug-2005
ROPView PDF
-
25-Jul-2005
ROPView PDF
-
25-Jul-2005
ROPView PDF
-
25-Jul-2005
ROPView PDF
-
25-Jul-2005
ROPView PDF
-
25-Jul-2005
ROPView PDF
-
25-Jul-2005
ROPView PDF
-
25-Jul-2005
ROPView PDF
-
25-Jul-2005
ROPView PDF
-
09-May-2005
ROPView PDF
-
09-May-2005
ROPView PDF
-
09-May-2005
ROPView PDF
-
09-May-2005
ROPView PDF
-
09-May-2005
ROPView PDF
-
09-May-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-May-2005
ROPView PDF
-
09-May-2005
ROPView PDF
-
09-May-2005
ROPView PDF
-
07-Mar-2005
ROPView PDF
-
28-Feb-2005
ROPView PDF
-
23-Feb-2005
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 6783/2009
Case Summary: C.A. No. 6783/2009 U.T. Chandigarh v. Thangavel (decided 3 April 2014) The Supreme Court dismissed Chandigarh Administration's appeals challenging the regularization of work-charged/daily wage employees. The court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal and High Court decisions requiring regularization of respondents who had completed 25+ years of service. The court directed that if regular posts are unavailable, employees must continue in work-charged positions with full salary including dearness allowance and CPWD pensionary benefits; those already regularized receive regular employee benefits including gratuity and pension; widows receive family pension; and the administration must expedite remaining regularizations and pension payments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts