SURESH KUMAR vs THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH HOME SECRETARY — Crl.A. No. 638 - 639/2013

Case under 1511Ttf-criminal Law : Criminal Matters Other Than Covered by the Aforesaid Categories(cases Where Sentence of 2 Years to 5 Years Is Imposed.) Section II-C. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010041682013

Filing Date

06-Feb-2013

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 638 - 639/2013

Diary Number

4168/2013

Order Date

09-Jan-2025

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Partly Allowed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

1511TTF-Criminal Law : Criminal matters other than covered by the aforesaid categories(Cases where sentence of 2 years to 5 years is imposed.) Section II-C

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURESH KUMAR

    Adv. GAGAN GUPTA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [P-1] [Pr]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH HOME SECRETARY

    Adv. ABHINAV MUKERJI (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-1] [Gr] NISHANT KUMAR [R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Jan-2025

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 09-Jan-2025

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal

  4. 21-Jul-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 21-Jul-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 26-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 08-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 06-Feb-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 638 - 639/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Suresh Kumar v. State of Himachal Pradesh (Crl.A. 638-639/2013) The Supreme Court heard Suresh Kumar's appeal against his conviction under Section 304 Part-I IPC (culpable homicide not amounting to murder) with a 10-year sentence. Though the court upheld the conviction, finding the High Court correctly considered eyewitness evidence, it modified the sentence to time already served, considering the appellant's age, the incident's occurrence in 2000, and his period of incarceration. The appeals were allowed in part, bail bonds were discharged, and the case concluded on January 9, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case