NISTALA VENKATARAMANAMMA(D)THR.LRS.&ORS. vs COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM . — SLP(C) No. 8913/2004
Case under Section XII-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010041472004
Filing Date
21-Feb-2004
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 8913/2004
Diary Number
4147/2004
Order Date
01-Oct-2013
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NISTALA VENKATARAMANAMMA(D)THR.LRS.&ORS.
Adv. ABHIJIT SENGUPTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM .
Adv. G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD (Dead / Retired / Elevated) C. K. SUCHARITA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Oct-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Dec-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Oct-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Nov-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Aug-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Jul-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Feb-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Aug-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Sep-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Aug-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Apr-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Apr-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Feb-2004
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 8913/2004
Summary of SLP(C) No. 8913/2004 On 01/10/2013, the Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petitions filed by Nistala Venkataramanamma and others challenging the High Court's dismissal of their land grabbing relief claims. The High Court had found the petitions premature because the petitioners' ownership status depended on pending proceedings under the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976, and the land was declared a slum area. The Supreme Court upheld this decision, directing appropriate authorities to examine whether proceedings under the repealed Urban Land Act could be concluded, and permitted parties to approach relevant authorities under the Land Grabbing, Slum Improvement, and Urban Land Acts as appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts