RAMA KANT PANDEY . vs RAM DEO PANDEY . — C.A. No. 6109/2008

Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010041312008

Filing Date

11-Feb-2008

Registration No

C.A. No. 6109/2008

Diary Number

4131/2008

Order Date

02-May-2018

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMA KANT PANDEY .

    Adv. T. MAHIPAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAM DEO PANDEY .

    Adv. GUNNAM VENKATESWARA RAO GARIMA PRASHAD (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-May-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 02-May-2018

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit

  4. 07-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 09-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 05-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 17-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 30-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 21-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 03-Oct-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 26-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 01-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 16-Jul-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 12-May-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 11-Feb-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 6109/2008

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of C.A. No. 006109/2008 - Rama Kant Pandey v. Ram Deo Pandey The Supreme Court allowed the appellants' impleadment application in the pending appeal before the Additional Commissioner, Varanasi. The appellants claimed interest in property based on a registered gift deed executed on 8th October, 1969, and sought to be added as parties after their earlier impleadment application was rejected. The Court set aside the impugned orders of the High Court and Additional Commissioner and directed the appeal to be decided on merits after hearing the appellants, without commenting on the substantive issues. The appeal was allowed on 2nd May 2018. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case