PADMAVATI DEVADATTA KAMAT vs VIJAYKUMAR NARAYAN MEHANDALE — C.A. No. 7684/1995
Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010040921995
Filing Date
25-Aug-1995
Registration No
C.A. No. 7684/1995
Diary Number
4092/1995
Order Date
04-Mar-2002
Document Type
Judgment - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PADMAVATI DEVADATTA KAMAT
Adv. SUCHITRA ATUL CHITALE
Respondent(s)
-
1.VIJAYKUMAR NARAYAN MEHANDALE
Adv. A. S. BHASME (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
The Supreme Court dismissed the tenant appellants' eviction appeal, upholding three concurrent lower court findings that the tenant family had acquired suitable alternative accommodation (in the son's name) for their joint benefit, justifying the landlord's eviction on grounds of self-occupation. The court found no perversity in the factual findings and rejected the appellant's unsubstantiated claims that the alternate accommodation was exclusively for one family member's benefit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts