COMMON CAUSE 'A REGISTERED SOCIETY vs UNION OF INDIA . — CONMT.PET.(C) No. 81/2000
Case under Section Z_NOT KNOWN. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010040542000
Filing Date
02-Mar-2000
Registration No
CONMT.PET.(C) No. 81/2000
Diary Number
4054/2000
Order Date
28-Sep-2005
Document Type
Judgment - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.COMMON CAUSE 'A REGISTERED SOCIETY
Adv. KAMINI JAISWAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA .
Adv. P. PARMESWARAN T. V. RATNAM PETITIONER-IN-PERSON ASHOK K. MAHAJAN S. P. SHARMA SYED SHAHID HUSSAIN RIZVI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Sep-2005
Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Sep-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Sep-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Mar-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Mar-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Dec-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Jul-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Mar-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Feb-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Mar-2000
Case filed
Registration No. CONMT.PET.(C) No. 81/2000
Case Summary: Common Cause v. Union of India (2005) The Supreme Court disposed of contempt petitions alleging that bar associations violated its earlier judgment by penalizing lawyers who refused to participate in strike calls. The Court held that lawyers have no right to strike or boycott courts; individual advocates must remain free to appear without coercion or expulsion threats. The Court reiterated that Bar Councils must ensure compliance and can only permit limited non-disruptive protests (armbands, press statements). Since the incidents occurred in 1999-2000 with no repetition, no further action was taken, though the Court expressed hope that Bar Council of India would incorporate these protections into its disciplinary rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts