LAKSHMAMMA vs COMMNR. BANGALORE DEV. AUTH. . — C.A. No. 4088/2010

Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010040092008

Filing Date

08-Feb-2008

Registration No

C.A. No. 4088/2010

Diary Number

4009/2008

Order Date

28-Mar-2018

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2018 INSC 281

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LAKSHMAMMA

    Adv. S. N. BHAT (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.COMMNR. BANGALORE DEV. AUTH. .

    Adv. K. K. MANI VIJAY KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Mar-2018

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 28-Mar-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 28-Mar-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha

  5. 22-Mar-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 22-Mar-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha

  7. 15-Mar-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 15-Mar-2018

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit

  9. 14-Mar-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 24-Apr-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 24-Apr-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 24-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 30-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 11-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 26-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 13-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 08-Feb-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 4088/2010

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

The Supreme Court allowed Lakshmamma's appeal and set aside the Bangalore Development Authority's orders refusing to restore her "khata" (property record). The Court found that prior orders from the Registrar of Co-operative Societies and High Court had already protected her allotment rights despite caste restrictions, making the Authority's denial baseless and reflecting complete non-application of mind. The Authority was directed to immediately restore the khata in her name. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case