PRADEEP KUMAR SAH GANGOLA vs RIZWANA KHAN — CONMT.PET.(C) No. 81/2026

Case under Civil Law : Any Matter Arising Out of Civil Suit/proceedings, Which Is Not Covered in Any of the Above Categories Section III-A. Status: Pending.

Pending

CNR: SCIN010039932026

Filing Date

20-Jan-2026

Registration No

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 81/2026

Diary Number

3993/2026

Order Date

15-May-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Law : Any matter arising out of Civil suit/proceedings, which is not covered in any of the above categories Section III-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRADEEP KUMAR SAH GANGOLA

    Adv. VARDHMAN KAUSHIK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RIZWANA KHAN

    Adv. JAGRATI SINGH[R-1] JAGRATI SINGH[R-3]

Case History

  1. 27-May-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.V. Viswanathan

  2. 15-May-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 15-May-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vijay Bishnoi

  4. 14-May-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 14-May-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan

  6. 11-May-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 30-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 30-Apr-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vijay Bishnoi

  9. 23-Mar-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 23-Mar-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vijay Bishnoi

  11. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 20-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CONMT.PET.(C) No. 81/2026

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CONMT.PET.(C) No. 81/2026 On 15-05-2026, the Supreme Court heard this contempt petition arising from a landlord-tenant dispute over a hotel property. The Court noted that while possession was handed over on 14-05-2026 (as required by the 31-12-2025 deadline), three establishments—a saloon, gym, and restaurant named Milan—remain occupied within the premises, allegedly not part of the original lease. The Court directed the petitioners' counsel to furnish details of all occupants of these three establishments by the next hearing and posted the matter to 28-05-2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case