MADAN LAL . vs SUKH RAJ @ SUKH RAM . — C.A. No. 8807/2012
Case under Section XV. Status: DISPOSED.
CNR: SCIN010039792007
Filing Date
07-Feb-2007
Registration No
C.A. No. 8807/2012
Diary Number
3979/2007
Order Date
24-Jan-2018
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Data as of 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MADAN LAL .
Adv. T. R. B. SIVAKUMAR
Respondent(s)
SUKH RAJ @ SUKH RAM .
Adv. SURYA KANT
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI and HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI
After Week/Month/Vacation
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Ordinary
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-Jan-2018 | After Week/Month/Vacation |
| 06-Dec-2017 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 23-Nov-2017 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 22-Nov-2017 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 27-Jul-2017 | Ordinary |
Orders
Summary: Madan Lal v. Sukh Raj @ Sukh Ram (C.A. No. 8807/2012) The Supreme Court dismissed both appeals on January 24, 2018. Madan Lal's redemption suit for land and shop house was initially granted by trial and appellate courts via preliminary decree. The High Court converted this to a final decree limited to land only after plaintiffs' counsel conceded the shop house should be excluded. Defendants appealed the redemption decree (CA 8807/2012) while plaintiffs appealed the shop house exclusion (CA 8808/2012). The Court upheld the High Court's findings that the mortgage was validly proved through certified copies despite defendants not producing originals, and that defendants' own purchase deed contained admissions of plaintiffs' ownership. Both appeals were dismissed; the redemption decree regarding the land stood affirmed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts