MANAGEMENT OF DIRECTOR,MICROWAVE ETR. vs WORKMEN,REP.BY PRES.O.T.M.M.SANGHA — C.A. No. 3600/2009

Case under Section XI-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010039632009

Filing Date

09-Feb-2009

Registration No

C.A. No. 3600/2009

Diary Number

3963/2009

Order Date

06-Feb-2020

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XI-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANAGEMENT OF DIRECTOR,MICROWAVE ETR.

    Adv. RAJIV SHANKAR DVIVEDI[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.WORKMEN,REP.BY PRES.O.T.M.M.SANGHA

    Adv. TEJASWI KUMAR PRADHAN[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Feb-2020

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 06-Feb-2020

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph

  4. 05-Feb-2020

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 05-Feb-2020

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph

  6. 04-Feb-2020

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph

  7. 30-Jan-2020

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph

  8. 01-Aug-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 01-Aug-2019

    IA

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indu Malhotra

  10. 29-Jul-2019

    IA

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta

  11. 22-Jul-2019

    IA

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta

  12. 31-Oct-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 31-Oct-2018

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vineet Saran

  14. 29-Oct-2018

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

  15. 10-Sep-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 10-Sep-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

  17. 20-Aug-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 20-Aug-2018

    IA

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vineet Saran

  19. 07-May-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 07-May-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

  21. 19-Mar-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 19-Mar-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

  23. 14-Dec-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 14-Dec-2017

    IA

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha

  25. 14-Dec-2017

    IA

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha

  26. 06-Nov-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 06-Nov-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 10-Apr-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 10-Apr-2017

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 10-Apr-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 08-Mar-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 08-Mar-2017

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 08-Mar-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. 21-Oct-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  35. 21-Oct-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  36. 21-Oct-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  37. 21-Oct-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  38. 21-Oct-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  39. 21-Oct-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  40. 21-Oct-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  41. 21-Oct-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  42. 02-Sep-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  43. 02-Sep-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  44. 02-Sep-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  45. 30-Apr-2015
  46. 30-Apr-2015
  47. 12-Feb-2015
  48. 12-Feb-2015
  49. 28-Nov-2014
  50. 11-Sep-2014
  51. 09-Jul-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  52. 25-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  53. 13-Dec-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  54. 24-Jan-2013
  55. 08-May-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  56. 15-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  57. 09-Feb-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 3600/2009

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Supreme Court disposed of both civil appeals (C.A. 3600/2009 and C.A. 747/2013) on February 6, 2020, uphholding the High Court's decision to grant temporary status to the workmen rather than permanent absorption. The Court declined to disturb the existing position and left the underlying legal question open, directing each party to bear its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case