GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI vs OKHLA FACTORY OWNER'S ASSON.. — C.A. No. 1691/2007

Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010039052003

Filing Date

18-Feb-2003

Registration No

C.A. No. 1691/2007

Diary Number

3905/2003

Order Date

05-Sep-2011

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XIV-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI

    Adv. SUDARSHAN RAJAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.OKHLA FACTORY OWNER'S ASSON..

    Adv. SAHARYA & CO. B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON V. K. VERMA RAJIV MEHTA RAJAN NARAIN SURESH CHANDRA TRIPATHY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 07-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 13-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 17-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 13-Apr-2009
  7. 20-Mar-2009
  8. 30-Jan-2009
  9. 19-Jan-2009
  10. 13-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 18-Dec-2008
  12. 02-May-2007
  13. 22-Mar-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 02-Mar-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 06-Feb-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 08-Nov-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 13-Oct-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 12-Sep-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 04-Aug-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 19-Jul-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 02-May-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 12-Dec-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 11-May-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 09-May-2005
  25. 08-Apr-2005
  26. 15-Mar-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 29-Aug-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 25-Jul-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 09-Jul-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 21-Apr-2003
  31. 03-Mar-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 19-Feb-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 18-Feb-2003

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 1691/2007

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: C.A. No. 001691/2007 The Yamuna Removal of Encroachments Monitoring Committee filed applications seeking impleadment as a party and clarification of the Court's September 7, 2010 order in the already-disposed civil appeals. The Supreme Court rejected both applications, holding that impleadment in a disposed matter was misconceived and unjustified since the Committee was never a party before the High Court or Supreme Court. Consequently, the clarification prayer was also rejected (September 5, 2011). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case