KRSHHI UPAJ MANDI SAMITI, JHALRAPATAN vs M/S. SINGHAL TRADING CO. — Crl.A. No. 1553 - 1554/2007

Case under Section II-D. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010038982007

Filing Date

06-Feb-2007

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 1553 - 1554/2007

Diary Number

3898/2007

Order Date

25-Sep-2013

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-D

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KRSHHI UPAJ MANDI SAMITI, JHALRAPATAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S. SINGHAL TRADING CO.

    Adv. B. S. BANTHIA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 14-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 24-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 17-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 25-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 01-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 13-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 03-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 16-Dec-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 27-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 02-Nov-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 07-Sep-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 16-Mar-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 06-Feb-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1553 - 1554/2007

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Krshhi Upaj Mandi Samiti v. M/S. Singhal Trading Co. The Supreme Court dismissed multiple consolidated criminal appeals filed by the Krshhi Upaj Mandi Samiti challenging the acquittal of M/S. Singhal Trading Co. for non-payment of market fees on loaf sugar purchases from Maharashtra during 1998-2000. The Court upheld the trial court and High Court's acquittal, finding that the complainant failed to prove the purchase and did not establish that the accused had admitted to purchasing from Maharashtra, rejecting the appellant's reliance on alleged admissions under Section 313 CrPC. The appeals were dismissed on September 25, 2013, with no merit found. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case