WALAITI RAM (D) THRU. LRS. vs S. DALIP SINGH — C.A. No. 1881/2004
Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010038362003
Filing Date
18-Feb-2003
Registration No
C.A. No. 1881/2004
Diary Number
3836/2003
Order Date
13-Dec-2005
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.WALAITI RAM (D) THRU. LRS.
Respondent(s)
-
1.S. DALIP SINGH
Adv. KAILASH CHAND (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Dec-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Aug-2005
ROPView PDF
-
25-Jul-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Nov-2004
ROPView PDF
-
27-Sep-2004
ROPView PDF
-
24-Sep-2004
ROPView PDF
-
06-Aug-2004
ROPView PDF
-
26-Jul-2004
ROPView PDF
-
26-Jul-2004
ROPView PDF
-
12-Jul-2004
ROPView PDF
-
19-Apr-2004
ROPView PDF
-
19-Apr-2004
ROPView PDF
-
16-Apr-2004
ROPView PDF
-
12-Apr-2004
ROPView PDF
-
08-Apr-2004
ROPView PDF
-
19-Mar-2004
ROPView PDF
-
08-Mar-2004
ROPView PDF
-
08-Mar-2004
ROPView PDF
-
23-Feb-2004
ROPView PDF
-
12-Jan-2004
ROPView PDF
-
08-Jan-2004
ROPView PDF
-
07-Jan-2004
ROPView PDF
-
19-Dec-2003
ROPView PDF
-
19-Dec-2003
ROPView PDF
-
29-Aug-2003
ROPView PDF
-
11-Aug-2003
ROPView PDF
-
11-Aug-2003
ROPView PDF
-
05-May-2003
ROPView PDF
-
26-Mar-2003
ROPView PDF
-
10-Mar-2003
ROPView PDF
-
18-Feb-2003
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 1881/2004
-
03-Feb-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Oct-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Aug-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
Summary of C.A. No. 1881 of 2004 (Walaiti Ram through LRS v. S. Dalip Singh) The Supreme Court allowed the tenant's appeal against eviction. The landlord had sought eviction on grounds of unauthorized change in business use (from cloth business to shoe manufacturing). The Court found no prohibition clause in the rent note barring additional businesses and relied on precedent (*Mohan Lal v. Jai Bhagwan*) establishing that absent explicit restrictions, change of user alone does not justify eviction. The impugned orders were set aside and the Rent Controller's dismissal of the eviction petition was restored. The landlord retained the right to seek fair rent fixation separately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts