WALAITI RAM (D) THRU. LRS. vs S. DALIP SINGH — C.A. No. 1881/2004

Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010038362003

Filing Date

18-Feb-2003

Registration No

C.A. No. 1881/2004

Diary Number

3836/2003

Order Date

13-Dec-2005

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.WALAITI RAM (D) THRU. LRS.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.S. DALIP SINGH

    Adv. KAILASH CHAND (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Dec-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 12-Aug-2005
  4. 25-Jul-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 01-Nov-2004
  6. 27-Sep-2004
  7. 24-Sep-2004
  8. 06-Aug-2004
  9. 26-Jul-2004
  10. 26-Jul-2004
  11. 12-Jul-2004
  12. 19-Apr-2004
  13. 19-Apr-2004
  14. 16-Apr-2004
  15. 12-Apr-2004
  16. 08-Apr-2004
  17. 19-Mar-2004
  18. 08-Mar-2004
  19. 08-Mar-2004
  20. 23-Feb-2004
  21. 12-Jan-2004
  22. 08-Jan-2004
  23. 07-Jan-2004
  24. 19-Dec-2003
  25. 19-Dec-2003
  26. 29-Aug-2003
  27. 11-Aug-2003
  28. 11-Aug-2003
  29. 05-May-2003
  30. 26-Mar-2003
  31. 10-Mar-2003
  32. 18-Feb-2003

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 1881/2004

  33. 03-Feb-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. 28-Oct-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  35. 19-Aug-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of C.A. No. 1881 of 2004 (Walaiti Ram through LRS v. S. Dalip Singh) The Supreme Court allowed the tenant's appeal against eviction. The landlord had sought eviction on grounds of unauthorized change in business use (from cloth business to shoe manufacturing). The Court found no prohibition clause in the rent note barring additional businesses and relied on precedent (*Mohan Lal v. Jai Bhagwan*) establishing that absent explicit restrictions, change of user alone does not justify eviction. The impugned orders were set aside and the Rent Controller's dismissal of the eviction petition was restored. The landlord retained the right to seek fair rent fixation separately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case