RAFIQ AHMAD vs YUSUF ALI — SLP(C) No. 8340/2013

Case under Section COURT MASTER WING. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010037562013

Filing Date

01-Feb-2013

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 8340/2013

Diary Number

3756/2013

Order Date

04-Feb-2019

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed for non-complying conditional Order

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section COURT MASTER WING

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAFIQ AHMAD

    Adv. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.YUSUF ALI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Feb-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 04-Feb-2019

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Subhash Reddy

  4. 12-Nov-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 12-Nov-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Registrar (A-J)

  6. 11-Apr-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 11-Apr-2018

    Ordinary

    Registrar (J) - IV

  8. 11-Jan-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 11-Jan-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Registrar (J) - IV

  10. 14-Nov-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 14-Nov-2017

    Fixed Date by Court

    Registrar (J) - IV

  12. 14-Sep-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 14-Sep-2017

    Ordinary

    Registrar (J) - IV

  14. 21-Aug-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 21-Aug-2017

    Fixed Date by Court

    Registrar (J) - IV

  16. 12-Jul-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 12-Jul-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 03-Apr-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 03-Apr-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 16-Feb-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 16-Feb-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 02-Jan-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 02-Jan-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 16-Nov-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 16-Nov-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 04-Oct-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 04-Oct-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 24-Aug-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 24-Aug-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 14-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 14-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 19-Apr-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 19-Apr-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. 26-Feb-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  35. 26-Feb-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  36. 18-Jan-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  37. 18-Jan-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  38. 29-Oct-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  39. 29-Oct-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  40. 12-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  41. 12-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  42. 23-Apr-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  43. 23-Apr-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  44. 13-Feb-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  45. 01-Dec-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  46. 25-Nov-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  47. 25-Nov-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  48. 05-Sep-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  49. 05-Sep-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  50. 03-Jul-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  51. 12-Feb-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  52. 21-Nov-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  53. 11-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  54. 23-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  55. 22-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  56. 25-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  57. 01-Feb-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 8340/2013

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Rafiq Ahmad v. Yusuf Ali, SLP(C) No. 8340/2013 On 04-02-2019, Justice R. Subhash Reddy heard the special leave petition. The petitioner had been previously permitted (via order dated 11.4.2018) to effect substituted service on the respondent within four weeks, but failed to file a formal application for the same. The Court granted the petitioner an additional four weeks to file a proper application seeking permission for substituted service on the sole respondent, with a warning that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the petition for non-prosecution without further notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case