THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE . vs NEELAMEGAM — C.A. No. 8760 - 8761/2013
Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010036902013
Filing Date
01-Feb-2013
Registration No
C.A. No. 8760 - 8761/2013
Diary Number
3690/2013
Order Date
16-Jun-2022
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE .
Adv. JOSEPH ARISTOTLE S. (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [P-1] [Gr]
Respondent(s)
-
1.NEELAMEGAM
Adv. P. SOMA SUNDARAM[Caveat]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2022
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jun-2022
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.S. Bopanna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath
-
14-May-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-May-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Sep-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Sep-2015
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Sep-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Sep-2013
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Sep-2013
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Aug-2013
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Feb-2013
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 8760 - 8761/2013
Summary: Civil Appeal Nos. 8760-8761/2013 The Supreme Court disposed of police appeals challenging a Madras High Court order that allowed respondent Neelamegam's appeal against his 2005 dismissal for misconduct (contracting marriage three times). Finding no error despite procedural violations, the Court upheld the High Court's decision because Neelamegam had attained superannuation age (31-8-2009), making remand futile. The Court directed appellants to disburse consequential benefits within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts