PUSHPA SADASIVAN vs THE STATE OF KERALA REP. BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR — C.A. No. 3547/2023
Case under Section XI-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010036152018
Filing Date
30-Jan-2018
Registration No
C.A. No. 3547/2023
Diary Number
3615/2018
Order Date
09-May-2023
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Leave Granted & Allowed
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PUSHPA SADASIVAN
Adv. RAJESH P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF KERALA REP. BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR
Adv. NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-1] NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-2]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-May-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-May-2023
Mention Memo
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant and Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala
-
24-Oct-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Oct-2019
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (J) - II
-
06-Sep-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Sep-2019
Ordinary
Registrar (J) - II
-
30-Jul-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jul-2019
IA
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari
-
17-Jul-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Jul-2019
IA
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha
-
08-Mar-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Mar-2019
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (J) - II
-
22-Jan-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Jan-2019
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (J) - II
-
19-Nov-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Nov-2018
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (J) - II
-
17-Sep-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Sep-2018
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (J) - II
-
27-Jul-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Jul-2018
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (J) - II
-
01-May-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-May-2018
Ordinary
Registrar (J) - II
-
12-Mar-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Mar-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jan-2018
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 3547/2023
-
16-Sep-2014
ROPView PDF
-
16-Sep-2014
ROPView PDF
-
04-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
23-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
Summary of C.A. No. 003547/2023 - Pushpa Sadasivan v. The State of Kerala The Supreme Court allowed a batch of 14 appeals by land-owners whose properties were acquired for Thiruvananthapuram International Airport development. The Court set aside the High Court's judgment reducing compensation and restored the higher compensation amounts awarded by the Reference Court, finding the High Court failed to provide adequate reasons for the reduction and relied on improper rough estimates instead of proper valuation methods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts