CHADU @ SANDU SATYANARAYANA (DEAD) BY LRS. vs SPL. CADRE DEPUTY REGISTRAR,DIST.. — C.A. No. 1654/2011

Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010034232007

Filing Date

01-Feb-2007

Registration No

C.A. No. 1654/2011

Diary Number

3423/2007

Order Date

02-May-2018

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHADU @ SANDU SATYANARAYANA (DEAD) BY LRS.

    Adv. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SPL. CADRE DEPUTY REGISTRAR,DIST..

    Adv. SRIDHAR POTARAJU (Dead / Retired / Elevated) G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-May-2018

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit

  3. 27-Jul-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  4. 11-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 19-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 29-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 11-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 04-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 28-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 20-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 01-Oct-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 26-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 24-Jul-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 02-May-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 25-Mar-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 22-Jan-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 03-Oct-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 10-Jul-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 01-Feb-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 1654/2011

Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters

Lead case: C.A. No. 1653/2011

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 1654/2011 On 11/07/2012, the Supreme Court heard Civil Appeal No. 1654/2011 (Chadu @ Sandu Satyanarayana v. SPL. Cadre Deputy Registrar & others) before Registrar S.G. Shah. After hearing counsel for both parties, the Court directed the Registry to process the matter for final hearing. No substantive order on merits was passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case